Price history, listings and card analysis
Lucario 126/214 Unbroken Bonds Reverse Holo (Reverse Holofoil). TCGplayer market price: $3.76 as of Oct 1, 2026. Recorded price history: 967 daily market-price observations, Feb 8, 2024 to Oct 1, 2026. 12-month recorded market-price range: $0.86 – $3.93. Performance versus the market: Over the last 2 months this card rose 7.1%, while the typical card we track rose 4.6%: it finished 2.4% ahead of the market, inside the 10% either way we count as moving with it. Its price has mostly been riding the market. TCGplayer lowest listed ask: $1.86 as of Oct 1, 2026, across conditions, before shipping. TCGplayer listed median: $3.76 as of Oct 1, 2026. Pokespective interest score: 43 out of 100 (Ordinary); It ranks above 44% of the cards we track. 60-day price forecast: An estimated 38% chance of beating the typical tracked card over 60 days; in a typical outcome it would end about 4.3% behind. Four times in five the price lands between $3.10 and $4.79. 60-day forecast: Likely range: $3.10 – $4.79; 8 in 10 outcomes. 60-day forecast: Middle half: $3.42 – $4.16; half of outcomes land here. 60-day forecast: Typical outcome: $3.74; -4.3% versus the market. 60-day forecast: Confidence: 58 / 100; a narrow range, not a better outcome.
Beating the market, or just riding it?
Moving with the market
Over the last 2 months this card rose 7.1%, while the typical card we track rose 4.6%: it finished 2.4% ahead of the market, inside the 10% either way we count as moving with it. Its price has mostly been riding the market.
Describes the last 2 months, not what happens next. Not investment advice.
Is this card interesting right now?
Ordinary - 43 out of 100
It ranks above 44% of the cards we track. The score describes the conditions around the card today - how sellers are pricing it, how it is trending, how steadily it trades. Its weights were tuned on how cards moved over the following 60 days, so a high score is a tendency across many cards, not a forecast for this one - and it says nothing about whether you will enjoy owning the card.
Why is it interesting?
Sellers undercutting and jumpy price
Median asking prices sit below the recent-sales market reference - sellers are pricing more aggressively. The price lurches around, so what you pay depends heavily on timing.
Is it becoming more popular?
Yes - consistently
Compared with the Pokemon market as a whole, so a rising tide does not count as popularity. In this market these trends have tended to keep going rather than reverse.
Past month+1.2%
Past 2 months+2.4%
Past 4 months+87.3%
Is it expensive or cheap?
$3.76 - expensive for its set
At $3.76 it is expensive for its set - number 87 of 410 by price. It costs more than 40% of other Holo Rare cards we track. It is at or near its highest price of the past year.
What makes this card unusual?
An ordinary Holo Rare from a 7-year-old set
Holo Rare is a widely printed rarity - 3,435 tracked cards share it. This is the Reverse Holofoil printing, which is priced as a completely separate market from the other printings of the same artwork. The set is about 7 years old, so surviving copies in good condition get scarcer over time.
Could you actually buy or sell it?
Yes, with patience
The price changed in 31% of our checks over the past year across 365 observations. TCGplayer's market price only updates when a copy sells, so a low figure means the price shown may be stale and any trend reading is built on very few real sales.
How does the grading fee compare?
Fee exceeds raw price
A roughly $22.00 grading fee is 585% of the $3.76 raw price. Raw price plus fee comes to about $25.76, before shipping, insurance or selling costs. That is a cost comparison, not an estimate of a graded copy's value. We track raw ungraded prices only - no graded sales and no population data. We cannot assess this copy's condition or tell you what a PSA 10 is worth. Check condition and comparable graded sales before deciding whether grading would pay off.
TCGplayer market price on the last day we have for each month; the current month so far.
